On this day of turkey and football, I ask what are you thankful for?
For myself I am thankful that in 1620 a group of settlers were able to make it after a long and dangerous 9 week journey were able to make it to a new country.
I am thankful that in 1776, an enlightened group of men were able to sign a Declaration of Independence and form a new nation.
I am thankful that in 1789, those same men were able to sign a working Constitution that set forth a nation that has lead the world to freedom and a better way of life.
I am thankful that in 1836, men stood firm in their belief in freedom and liberty at a little mission named the Alamo.
I am thankful for 50 states that work together as one.
I am thankful that because of those acts I am able to sit here and voice my opinion. Knowing that my brothers in arms are standing vigilant around the world to protect our rights to be free.
I am thankful that despite a poor educational system, we are able to sit down and examine the facts and make our own decisions on how we choose to live in a society, that we still have the right to choose for the most part how we spend our money. That we have the right support a candidate of our choosing and one that most resembles our beliefs with out retribution from those who oppose our views.
I am thankful to be an AMERICAN, how about you?
I am watching.
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Colorado example of split in Ideology
The State Legislature in Colorado is a prime example of the political divide that we in this country suffer from. In control we have those who believe that tax and spend policy is best. A policy in which government is the solution to the problems of the people.
On the other side are those who see government not as a solution but a hindrance to solving problems. A reduction in taxes and a more responsible government as answers to the problems faced today.
A committee on job creation is just the latest to expose the problems our government faces. The Democrats on the committee believe that job creation and economic growth can play a vital role in buffering Colorado against the effects of a recession. A huge DUUAAAH on that. Suggested putting money into infrastructure projects that can create jobs. However the way Colorado is set up. A bidding war and closed door negotiations will only decide who gets the contracts to handle these infrastructure projects.
The state also could use incentives and job training at the college level to attract more renewable-energy businesses. However following along with the current thought in Washington D.C. a higher rate of tax is wanted by government to be placed on industry. So why would a company come to Colorado and face higher corporate taxes? They wouldn't.
The Republicans suggested the committee instead reduce burdensome business regulations. The state should concentrate on helping the oil and gas industry, the one area prospering during this economic downturn,said Republican members. A very unpopular concept with the liberal press and academics in State. A clear opposite to what the Democrats propose.
In a brief exchange with the press the ideological difference come through from two State Senators.
Sen. Shawn Mitchell, R-Broomfield, said he hoped the committee's emphasis "doesn't focus on things that are trendy over things that are tried-and-true."
Sen. Jennifer Veiga, D-Denver, replied: "I look forward to exploring all options, trendy or tried- and-true."
Lawmakers on the committee were asked to focus on four areas: 1) developing small businesses and nonprofits; 2) improving infrastructure; 3) expanding the "new energy economy"; 4)stimulating job growth in rural communities.
Democrats spoke of the need to spend money on constructing highways and buildings to put people to work and create something of value for the state. Yet failed to answer how they would fiance these projects. We all know that the answer is to raise funds through higher taxes. With a Democratic liberal controlled legislature, they are not about to cut any spending to find the funds necessary for this. So the only way would be to raise taxes.
Sen. Chris Romer, a Denver Democrat,and son of former state Governor Roy Romer. Said America did much to build its way out of the Great Depression but added the state should not wait "for manna from heaven to fall from the federal government."
Though only half true with his statement he failed to mention that the vamping up of the war machine do to WWII is what really kick started a slow and sluggish economy in 1941.
The bottom line and truth of the matter was summed up by Rep. Joe Rice, the Democrat Representative from Littleton. "I think it's so far been a brutally healthy discussion. We may come up with a hundred things we can do, but we've got to figure out what we've got the money for."
This, the latest in committees to come out and pander solutions just demonstrates the opposition in ideas from both sides and how far apart they are.
I am watching, are you?
On the other side are those who see government not as a solution but a hindrance to solving problems. A reduction in taxes and a more responsible government as answers to the problems faced today.
A committee on job creation is just the latest to expose the problems our government faces. The Democrats on the committee believe that job creation and economic growth can play a vital role in buffering Colorado against the effects of a recession. A huge DUUAAAH on that. Suggested putting money into infrastructure projects that can create jobs. However the way Colorado is set up. A bidding war and closed door negotiations will only decide who gets the contracts to handle these infrastructure projects.
The state also could use incentives and job training at the college level to attract more renewable-energy businesses. However following along with the current thought in Washington D.C. a higher rate of tax is wanted by government to be placed on industry. So why would a company come to Colorado and face higher corporate taxes? They wouldn't.
The Republicans suggested the committee instead reduce burdensome business regulations. The state should concentrate on helping the oil and gas industry, the one area prospering during this economic downturn,said Republican members. A very unpopular concept with the liberal press and academics in State. A clear opposite to what the Democrats propose.
In a brief exchange with the press the ideological difference come through from two State Senators.
Sen. Shawn Mitchell, R-Broomfield, said he hoped the committee's emphasis "doesn't focus on things that are trendy over things that are tried-and-true."
Sen. Jennifer Veiga, D-Denver, replied: "I look forward to exploring all options, trendy or tried- and-true."
Lawmakers on the committee were asked to focus on four areas: 1) developing small businesses and nonprofits; 2) improving infrastructure; 3) expanding the "new energy economy"; 4)stimulating job growth in rural communities.
Democrats spoke of the need to spend money on constructing highways and buildings to put people to work and create something of value for the state. Yet failed to answer how they would fiance these projects. We all know that the answer is to raise funds through higher taxes. With a Democratic liberal controlled legislature, they are not about to cut any spending to find the funds necessary for this. So the only way would be to raise taxes.
Sen. Chris Romer, a Denver Democrat,and son of former state Governor Roy Romer. Said America did much to build its way out of the Great Depression but added the state should not wait "for manna from heaven to fall from the federal government."
Though only half true with his statement he failed to mention that the vamping up of the war machine do to WWII is what really kick started a slow and sluggish economy in 1941.
The bottom line and truth of the matter was summed up by Rep. Joe Rice, the Democrat Representative from Littleton. "I think it's so far been a brutally healthy discussion. We may come up with a hundred things we can do, but we've got to figure out what we've got the money for."
This, the latest in committees to come out and pander solutions just demonstrates the opposition in ideas from both sides and how far apart they are.
I am watching, are you?
Friday, November 21, 2008
Healthy Forests/Vibrant Communities Act
Here comes what at first appears to be another poorly designed and planned, rehashed group of legislative bills for the environment.
Gov. Bill Ritter and a group of bipartisan lawmakers but by no means a group of law makers with common sense. Announced on November 12TH the "Healthy Forests/Vibrant Communities Act of 2009," a legislative proposal that would protect Colorado's "prized" forest lands, assist local communities and stimulate economic activity.
The Act would include four pieces of questionable legislation, providing:
Resources and technical support to ensure that local communities can adequately assess wildfire risks and create effective response plans.
Additional support to reduce imminent threats through thinning projects focused on protecting lives, homes and community investments such as reservoirs, power lines and other infrastructure.
Increased focus on long-term restoration projects in community watersheds to protect public water supplies and create high-quality wildlife habitat.
A revolving loan fund to support businesses and create jobs by finding new ways to market timber and other wood products generated by community protection efforts.
The proposed cost of this will be funded with $5.5 million in FY09-10 with the Severance Tax Operational Account, which derives its revenues from the tax that oil and gas companies pay to "sever" or extract energy resources in Colorado.
"We've worked very hard the last two years to educate the public about the bark beetle scourge and to address the problem as best we can with our limited resources," Rep. Scanlan said. "We've been as creative as possible. But creativity and luck just aren't enough. We must overcome the threat of devastating wildfires that may jeopardize the region's infrastructure, wildlife, communities and economies."
Let us dissect these proposals just a little bit. Try to examine what is really being said here.
First the call for resources and technical support. There is no definition of what this will be. When saying they need more resources does this mean more man power? Does it call for money? Just what are these resources that is called for here? The question to the technical support is that of man power I would presume but who and how many. Are these to be state employees, or contracted out to a company that bids on a contract to work in the states forests.
An increase in long term impact on water sheds?The public, power lines etc. This sounds to me not as a way to move forward but more impact studies that will bog down any true action in solving the problem.
Additional support in the reduction of threats to homes, communities, and wild life areas. OK now we are making a little progress here. But when they ask for support does this mean reaching out and being slapped in the face by more of the tree huggers and their failed management of the forests? It is these EPA and conservation regulations that need to be examined and mostly repealed in order to go in and enact fire breaks and remove the pine beetle kill.
One can easily manage with common sense and a little effort the balance of wildlife, the forests and man. Unfortunately so far we haven't had any one with this common sense in office to do so.
The fourth issue of promoting businesses to use and market the wood I support. There are many businesses and charities that can use this wood. Local saw mills, local lumber yards, enterprising craftsman who make rugged furniture. There are lots of ways this can be marketed. The question is how much of a cut into the profits will the state want for someone else's work.
The taxing of oil and other energy companies is another way of trying to hurt the big bad oil companies. Especially since Coloradoans were smart enough to vote down the tax proposition to raise 300 plus million in taxes on these companies. There is other ways of funding these projects. As a matter of fact I am currently talking to my state Representative in these ways to make it profitable to do so. ( more on that possibly later)
Claims of being a decade into the pine-beetle epidemic, is false. We have good years and we have bad years. Currently 1.5 million acres of mature, high-country lodge pole pine forests have been effected. Some forest health experts say up to 2.2 million more acres of mixed conifer forests will be impacted in the coming years. Well to this DUUUUAH!
Unless we enact a smart effective way to remove the dead wood and infected beetle kill, spray other possible infected trees. We are looking at a lot more then 2.2 million acres in the future. Not to mention those areas that will be bystander innocent to fires brought on by dead, dry wood.
I AM WATCHING.
Gov. Bill Ritter and a group of bipartisan lawmakers but by no means a group of law makers with common sense. Announced on November 12TH the "Healthy Forests/Vibrant Communities Act of 2009," a legislative proposal that would protect Colorado's "prized" forest lands, assist local communities and stimulate economic activity.
The Act would include four pieces of questionable legislation, providing:
Resources and technical support to ensure that local communities can adequately assess wildfire risks and create effective response plans.
Additional support to reduce imminent threats through thinning projects focused on protecting lives, homes and community investments such as reservoirs, power lines and other infrastructure.
Increased focus on long-term restoration projects in community watersheds to protect public water supplies and create high-quality wildlife habitat.
A revolving loan fund to support businesses and create jobs by finding new ways to market timber and other wood products generated by community protection efforts.
The proposed cost of this will be funded with $5.5 million in FY09-10 with the Severance Tax Operational Account, which derives its revenues from the tax that oil and gas companies pay to "sever" or extract energy resources in Colorado.
"We've worked very hard the last two years to educate the public about the bark beetle scourge and to address the problem as best we can with our limited resources," Rep. Scanlan said. "We've been as creative as possible. But creativity and luck just aren't enough. We must overcome the threat of devastating wildfires that may jeopardize the region's infrastructure, wildlife, communities and economies."
Let us dissect these proposals just a little bit. Try to examine what is really being said here.
First the call for resources and technical support. There is no definition of what this will be. When saying they need more resources does this mean more man power? Does it call for money? Just what are these resources that is called for here? The question to the technical support is that of man power I would presume but who and how many. Are these to be state employees, or contracted out to a company that bids on a contract to work in the states forests.
An increase in long term impact on water sheds?The public, power lines etc. This sounds to me not as a way to move forward but more impact studies that will bog down any true action in solving the problem.
Additional support in the reduction of threats to homes, communities, and wild life areas. OK now we are making a little progress here. But when they ask for support does this mean reaching out and being slapped in the face by more of the tree huggers and their failed management of the forests? It is these EPA and conservation regulations that need to be examined and mostly repealed in order to go in and enact fire breaks and remove the pine beetle kill.
One can easily manage with common sense and a little effort the balance of wildlife, the forests and man. Unfortunately so far we haven't had any one with this common sense in office to do so.
The fourth issue of promoting businesses to use and market the wood I support. There are many businesses and charities that can use this wood. Local saw mills, local lumber yards, enterprising craftsman who make rugged furniture. There are lots of ways this can be marketed. The question is how much of a cut into the profits will the state want for someone else's work.
The taxing of oil and other energy companies is another way of trying to hurt the big bad oil companies. Especially since Coloradoans were smart enough to vote down the tax proposition to raise 300 plus million in taxes on these companies. There is other ways of funding these projects. As a matter of fact I am currently talking to my state Representative in these ways to make it profitable to do so. ( more on that possibly later)
Claims of being a decade into the pine-beetle epidemic, is false. We have good years and we have bad years. Currently 1.5 million acres of mature, high-country lodge pole pine forests have been effected. Some forest health experts say up to 2.2 million more acres of mixed conifer forests will be impacted in the coming years. Well to this DUUUUAH!
Unless we enact a smart effective way to remove the dead wood and infected beetle kill, spray other possible infected trees. We are looking at a lot more then 2.2 million acres in the future. Not to mention those areas that will be bystander innocent to fires brought on by dead, dry wood.
I AM WATCHING.
Monday, November 17, 2008
Vetting the new administration
The vetting process is very important. What it boils down to is looking into the background of nominations to cabinet positions. This is to see whether or not there may be something surprising or may cause concern with bad p.r. to the administration.
As a country we failed to vent the president elect, or more correctly I should say that the Obama campaign was successful in preventing a proper vetting of the candidate. By not allowing and blatant putting off limits basic questions as to Obama's background. We now have a president elect that we know very little about.
With more than 300 cabinet secretaries, deputies and assistant secretaries and more than 2,500 political appointees to be chosen. The vetting process of this new Administration is clearly a national issue.
Amazingly in 2001, it took an average of 60 days to get a nominee's name to the Senate after presidential approval. The Obama team, with White House assistance, is aiming for a maximum of 30 days. A little extra push from political friends to rush certain nominees to their new jobs. Political payback perhaps for support in the lack of vetting during the campaign?
Although Barack Hussein Obama is the most liberal and farthest left to ever be elected to office. He does not go far enough.
Yes Virginia, Obama is no the end of the extreme left but only the beginning of the extremist!
The extremists over on the Huff Post are fuming that the possibility of Sec. Gates will remain in office under Obama's presidency. Fact that Sec. Gates is not the best person for this job is not an argument. The fact that he will not disassemble the military and leave this country defenseless is what drives the extremists crazy. Rest assured though. As soon as Obama gets his bearing on how the military works and is working on foreign shores, he will replace Sec. Gates in a heart beat with a boot licker of his liking.
A second note is on how the Obama inner circle is vetting these nominees. This is something that is not getting enough airtime and understanding. So far we know that those who have owned a gun or own a handgun are being disqualified. This is something to think about with a man who proposes a civilian armed security force that would rival the military.
I AM WATCHING
As a country we failed to vent the president elect, or more correctly I should say that the Obama campaign was successful in preventing a proper vetting of the candidate. By not allowing and blatant putting off limits basic questions as to Obama's background. We now have a president elect that we know very little about.
With more than 300 cabinet secretaries, deputies and assistant secretaries and more than 2,500 political appointees to be chosen. The vetting process of this new Administration is clearly a national issue.
Amazingly in 2001, it took an average of 60 days to get a nominee's name to the Senate after presidential approval. The Obama team, with White House assistance, is aiming for a maximum of 30 days. A little extra push from political friends to rush certain nominees to their new jobs. Political payback perhaps for support in the lack of vetting during the campaign?
Although Barack Hussein Obama is the most liberal and farthest left to ever be elected to office. He does not go far enough.
Yes Virginia, Obama is no the end of the extreme left but only the beginning of the extremist!
The extremists over on the Huff Post are fuming that the possibility of Sec. Gates will remain in office under Obama's presidency. Fact that Sec. Gates is not the best person for this job is not an argument. The fact that he will not disassemble the military and leave this country defenseless is what drives the extremists crazy. Rest assured though. As soon as Obama gets his bearing on how the military works and is working on foreign shores, he will replace Sec. Gates in a heart beat with a boot licker of his liking.
A second note is on how the Obama inner circle is vetting these nominees. This is something that is not getting enough airtime and understanding. So far we know that those who have owned a gun or own a handgun are being disqualified. This is something to think about with a man who proposes a civilian armed security force that would rival the military.
I AM WATCHING
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Stimulas focus in the wrong place
As our elected officials plot new ways to waste the tax payers money. The focus seems to be turning to putting more money into a broken system. The concept of a handout over a hand up is always the liberal progressive thinkers answer to all economic and social problems. Let us throw more money at it and it will go away.
As Colorado's state government is grappling with a possible $101 million budget shortfall and lawmakers are looking to Washington for help. Gov. Bill Ritter's lean budget for next year could get thinner by trimming things such as money to stimulate job creation. State Sen. Moe Keller, a Wheat Ridge Democrat and Joint Budget Committee chairwoman. Said she's contacted some members of the national congressional delegation to talk about a potential second stimulus package.
"That is problematic for us, so I am hoping that some kind of economic stimulus package will come to us," said Keller. Yet another prime example of holding the hand out looking for aid instead of doing something about it. A key part of Gov. Ritter's next year budget proposal is setting aside $77 million in a "rainy day" fund that could be used to maintain essential services if economic forecasts get worse. Setting aside this amount of money, then expecting that federal tax money pick up the slack is not just stingy, it is a gimme, mimme attitude.
"Every successful business, you've got to either increase your revenues or decrease your expenses when the books don't balance," said Rep. Don Marostica, R-Loveland, noting that the state can do little to raise revenues. Unless they raise taxes like the democrats propose.
The list of prioritised items that our elected officials want are in the following order. More money for Medicaid and unemployment insurance, and updating the power grid are at the top of what members of Colorado's congressional delegation hope to receive in a federal stimulus package for Colorado.
Notice the top of the list is handouts. More money for unemployment, medicare. If they were to go down the rolls on both of these and eliminate those who are on the rolls ILLEGALLY and undeservedly they may free up some money. Then this money can and should be used to create jobs.
By creating jobs I mean looking at state projects that need to be done. Once you kick off some of these projects you create jobs which in turn employee people who then spend money earned. What a concept huh?
The concept of taking monies and extending unemployment benefits only leads to a lack of initiative. You reward a person for nothing. If you set a limit and enforce the limit. Those who are on unemployment have more of an incentive to find a job. When people are looking for jobs (that is to say legally eligible citizens) companies compete for the more qualified workers. This creates a better work environment for employees.
When the economy is stimulated with work, not hand outs. The economy grows. If the economy is rewarded with hand outs and no direction to move forward, it slows and heads downward.
All these lessons are learned in ECONOMICS 101. Something our elected officials and the unions seem to have never taken as a class.
I AM WATCHING.
As Colorado's state government is grappling with a possible $101 million budget shortfall and lawmakers are looking to Washington for help. Gov. Bill Ritter's lean budget for next year could get thinner by trimming things such as money to stimulate job creation. State Sen. Moe Keller, a Wheat Ridge Democrat and Joint Budget Committee chairwoman. Said she's contacted some members of the national congressional delegation to talk about a potential second stimulus package.
"That is problematic for us, so I am hoping that some kind of economic stimulus package will come to us," said Keller. Yet another prime example of holding the hand out looking for aid instead of doing something about it. A key part of Gov. Ritter's next year budget proposal is setting aside $77 million in a "rainy day" fund that could be used to maintain essential services if economic forecasts get worse. Setting aside this amount of money, then expecting that federal tax money pick up the slack is not just stingy, it is a gimme, mimme attitude.
"Every successful business, you've got to either increase your revenues or decrease your expenses when the books don't balance," said Rep. Don Marostica, R-Loveland, noting that the state can do little to raise revenues. Unless they raise taxes like the democrats propose.
The list of prioritised items that our elected officials want are in the following order. More money for Medicaid and unemployment insurance, and updating the power grid are at the top of what members of Colorado's congressional delegation hope to receive in a federal stimulus package for Colorado.
Notice the top of the list is handouts. More money for unemployment, medicare. If they were to go down the rolls on both of these and eliminate those who are on the rolls ILLEGALLY and undeservedly they may free up some money. Then this money can and should be used to create jobs.
By creating jobs I mean looking at state projects that need to be done. Once you kick off some of these projects you create jobs which in turn employee people who then spend money earned. What a concept huh?
The concept of taking monies and extending unemployment benefits only leads to a lack of initiative. You reward a person for nothing. If you set a limit and enforce the limit. Those who are on unemployment have more of an incentive to find a job. When people are looking for jobs (that is to say legally eligible citizens) companies compete for the more qualified workers. This creates a better work environment for employees.
When the economy is stimulated with work, not hand outs. The economy grows. If the economy is rewarded with hand outs and no direction to move forward, it slows and heads downward.
All these lessons are learned in ECONOMICS 101. Something our elected officials and the unions seem to have never taken as a class.
I AM WATCHING.
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Colorado looks to hike fees again
In a clear mismanagement of highway funds. Governor Bill "tax" Ritter is looking at raising the fee to register ones vehicle by yet another $25 dollars. Why, because this current state maladministration can not budget the funds set specifically aside for the maintenance of the states highways and bridges.
There is no doubt that Colorado highways are suffering from a lack of maintenance, yet it is a falsehood to claim there is not enough money to care for the roads. The biggest project is the replacement of the Interstate 70 viaduct, built in 1964, between Brighton and Colorado boulevards. Replacement is estimated at $800 million. A huge question which falls on Ritter only because he is the current Governor is why has this not been repaired before hand and maintained?
This viaduct was built in 1964, it is now 2008 and looking at the 2009 fiscal year. That is 44 years of what? A lack of maintenance is it not? So now an estimated $800,000,000.00 million to repair is what they are proposing. Then in order to come up with these funds they are wanting to raise our fees to register our cars by at least $25 dollars.
I would like to know just what is being done with the money raised from the tax on fuel which is specifically earmarked to go to highway and bridge maintenance. How many millions are being siphoned off of this fund for what?
Gov. Ritter inherited this problem but his lack of being able to deal with it is going to cost Coloradoans millions. Though the state has major problems with highway maintenance and bridge repair. Ritter shows the typical Liberal fix it ideas. Tax the taxpayer more in order to fund the problem. Instead of managing the budget and maintaining TABOR, this is clearly another way around TABOR and a grab at our money in these tight economic times.
I AM WATCHING.
NOTE:
FY 07 - 08 Appropriations $1,062,132,447.00
FY 08 - 09 Request $1,299,343,852.00
an increase of $237,211,405.00 before the registration fee hike.
http://coloradoagriculture.com/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1224913540851&ssbinary=true
more info on State budgets: http://coloradoagriculture.com/cs/Satellite/GovRitter/GOVR/1189715443059?rendermode=preview
state info: http://coloradoagriculture.com/cs/Satellite/GovRitter/GOVR/1177024890424?rendermode=preview
There is no doubt that Colorado highways are suffering from a lack of maintenance, yet it is a falsehood to claim there is not enough money to care for the roads. The biggest project is the replacement of the Interstate 70 viaduct, built in 1964, between Brighton and Colorado boulevards. Replacement is estimated at $800 million. A huge question which falls on Ritter only because he is the current Governor is why has this not been repaired before hand and maintained?
This viaduct was built in 1964, it is now 2008 and looking at the 2009 fiscal year. That is 44 years of what? A lack of maintenance is it not? So now an estimated $800,000,000.00 million to repair is what they are proposing. Then in order to come up with these funds they are wanting to raise our fees to register our cars by at least $25 dollars.
I would like to know just what is being done with the money raised from the tax on fuel which is specifically earmarked to go to highway and bridge maintenance. How many millions are being siphoned off of this fund for what?
Gov. Ritter inherited this problem but his lack of being able to deal with it is going to cost Coloradoans millions. Though the state has major problems with highway maintenance and bridge repair. Ritter shows the typical Liberal fix it ideas. Tax the taxpayer more in order to fund the problem. Instead of managing the budget and maintaining TABOR, this is clearly another way around TABOR and a grab at our money in these tight economic times.
I AM WATCHING.
NOTE:
FY 07 - 08 Appropriations $1,062,132,447.00
FY 08 - 09 Request $1,299,343,852.00
an increase of $237,211,405.00 before the registration fee hike.
http://coloradoagriculture.com/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1224913540851&ssbinary=true
more info on State budgets: http://coloradoagriculture.com/cs/Satellite/GovRitter/GOVR/1189715443059?rendermode=preview
state info: http://coloradoagriculture.com/cs/Satellite/GovRitter/GOVR/1177024890424?rendermode=preview
Tuesday, November 11, 2008
A day to give thanks
Today was a day to stop and shake the hands of those who wore the Uniform of this Great Country. Be that of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, or the beloved Marine Corps.
This day was set aside to remember those specifically who answered the call of their country. A day to stand and praise their real PATRIOTISM. It is a day of history that is living and breathing.
When a Veteran goes by do you just stop and look. Or do you even bother to take note of this person? Chances are you just walk on by and not give them a second thought. Though this person came back his sacrifices are no less then those who we remember on Memorial day. For this man and woman gave up their life for a short time to DEFEND YOURS.
Maybe their service was one during a time of peace. But they were there standing the front lines just in case. Maybe they did see some action in the form of a humanitarian mission in some far off country you never heard of. They walked off ship or out of the belly of an airplane representing you and bringing hope to the world. A little comfort and relief to a catastrophe.
These men and women deserve a day to call their own. A day that we give thanks and respect for their sacrifices. Veterans are easy to spot. They are the ones who trudge through daily activities with their backs straight and their heads held high. When adversity comes their way they don't run and hide. They confront the problem and take it on.
These are real hero's and do not ask for much. Just a chance to go on with their lives and provide for their families. A chance to work and play. A chance to better themselves and others. Always giving and not asking.
So as the sun sets on this day ask yourself is not your life a little better for having these men and women in your life, whether you know it or not. So give thanks to them when you see them. take a moment to pat them on the back and say thanks. I do.
I am always watching.
This day was set aside to remember those specifically who answered the call of their country. A day to stand and praise their real PATRIOTISM. It is a day of history that is living and breathing.
When a Veteran goes by do you just stop and look. Or do you even bother to take note of this person? Chances are you just walk on by and not give them a second thought. Though this person came back his sacrifices are no less then those who we remember on Memorial day. For this man and woman gave up their life for a short time to DEFEND YOURS.
Maybe their service was one during a time of peace. But they were there standing the front lines just in case. Maybe they did see some action in the form of a humanitarian mission in some far off country you never heard of. They walked off ship or out of the belly of an airplane representing you and bringing hope to the world. A little comfort and relief to a catastrophe.
These men and women deserve a day to call their own. A day that we give thanks and respect for their sacrifices. Veterans are easy to spot. They are the ones who trudge through daily activities with their backs straight and their heads held high. When adversity comes their way they don't run and hide. They confront the problem and take it on.
These are real hero's and do not ask for much. Just a chance to go on with their lives and provide for their families. A chance to work and play. A chance to better themselves and others. Always giving and not asking.
So as the sun sets on this day ask yourself is not your life a little better for having these men and women in your life, whether you know it or not. So give thanks to them when you see them. take a moment to pat them on the back and say thanks. I do.
I am always watching.
Monday, November 10, 2008
Where do we start?
Where do we start in purging the party of RINO's? A god place to start would be at the election booth in electing strong Fiscal and Hawkish Republicans. yet how do we get these people there to vote on. Well we can turn to the talk radio.
Talk radio has been the focal point for the conservative movement for thirty plus years. yes there were Conservatives before Rush Limbaugh. Yes they were even on the radio. Some were good, some like today were bad.
The good ones seem to rise to the top and stay there. Such is the case of Rush. Now I am not a full blown ditto head so do not think that this is an endorsement of the Limbaugh show. Limbaugh as other good talk show host will tell you to listen and seek out the other point of view. Fact that Rush is right 8 out of 10 times is another. But he is correct in saying that the views of his show are his. The fact that many hold the same views is another.
Now what talk shows can we trust and listen to without fear of being given spin? Well this is the real question and one we need to examine big time. There are many wanna be talkers out there but few that are truly Conservative in nature.
How do we know this? Well look at who on the election night started to sing the praises of a socialist, Obama, and his possible new appointees. Laura Ingram, Hugh Hewitt, Dennis Miller (?), these are just a few candidates. Let us not forget Bill O'Rielly either.
All of FOX news both audio and video has got to have a second vetting now for what it is worth. A net work that once was fair and balanced has dramatically shifted to softballs of the democrats. A preemptive ploy on their part to try and stave off the on coming fairness in broadcasting censorship that is heading our way.
These RINO's in Conservative broadcasting need to be pushed out along with those in office as well. We cannot let them continue to try and direct a movement that does not reflect Conservative morals and ideas. Though all in some way or another may from time to time represent in some small way a Conservative agenda. They all fall short like Tom Tancredo did in his single item platform of presidential campaigning. We need more. What we need is talk radio to step up with more Rush Limbaugh's who cover the spectrum of the Conservative movement.
Some are now questioning why is Hugh Hewitt on this list. Well have you forgotten how he labeled those in the Conservative side of things Bigots when we did not accept his candidate of Mitt Romney. Not because he was Mormon but because we did not care for his platform. According to Hugh we were fickle and did not understand anything. What Hugh failed to grasp was that we did not support Romney's ideas on domestic policies or we did not support his global outlook. Under Hugh's thinking we were just bigots.
Then Hugh took up McCain like he was a savior to the Republican party. More would have supported Romney then McCain. Hugh even poo pooed Palin. A breath of fresh air, but not according to Hugh.
Laura Ingram on election night started to praise Obama instead of hammering home facts of his socialist agenda. Something we will get a close look at when he starts to abuse the EXECUTIVE ORDERS after he takes office.
Again more fuel for he RINO's. Giving credited to a move to the left. Something that we have got to stop now.
As long as we continue to allow these "moderates" to convince us that we need to bow down to the left we have no chance in maintaining any sort of semblance to fiscal responsibility and sound judgment on foreign issues. We have to send the message now that we will not bend our principles and values to those on the left. A strong backbone is required. RINO's are every where and are doing all they can to undermine the conservative movement.
I am watching/
Talk radio has been the focal point for the conservative movement for thirty plus years. yes there were Conservatives before Rush Limbaugh. Yes they were even on the radio. Some were good, some like today were bad.
The good ones seem to rise to the top and stay there. Such is the case of Rush. Now I am not a full blown ditto head so do not think that this is an endorsement of the Limbaugh show. Limbaugh as other good talk show host will tell you to listen and seek out the other point of view. Fact that Rush is right 8 out of 10 times is another. But he is correct in saying that the views of his show are his. The fact that many hold the same views is another.
Now what talk shows can we trust and listen to without fear of being given spin? Well this is the real question and one we need to examine big time. There are many wanna be talkers out there but few that are truly Conservative in nature.
How do we know this? Well look at who on the election night started to sing the praises of a socialist, Obama, and his possible new appointees. Laura Ingram, Hugh Hewitt, Dennis Miller (?), these are just a few candidates. Let us not forget Bill O'Rielly either.
All of FOX news both audio and video has got to have a second vetting now for what it is worth. A net work that once was fair and balanced has dramatically shifted to softballs of the democrats. A preemptive ploy on their part to try and stave off the on coming fairness in broadcasting censorship that is heading our way.
These RINO's in Conservative broadcasting need to be pushed out along with those in office as well. We cannot let them continue to try and direct a movement that does not reflect Conservative morals and ideas. Though all in some way or another may from time to time represent in some small way a Conservative agenda. They all fall short like Tom Tancredo did in his single item platform of presidential campaigning. We need more. What we need is talk radio to step up with more Rush Limbaugh's who cover the spectrum of the Conservative movement.
Some are now questioning why is Hugh Hewitt on this list. Well have you forgotten how he labeled those in the Conservative side of things Bigots when we did not accept his candidate of Mitt Romney. Not because he was Mormon but because we did not care for his platform. According to Hugh we were fickle and did not understand anything. What Hugh failed to grasp was that we did not support Romney's ideas on domestic policies or we did not support his global outlook. Under Hugh's thinking we were just bigots.
Then Hugh took up McCain like he was a savior to the Republican party. More would have supported Romney then McCain. Hugh even poo pooed Palin. A breath of fresh air, but not according to Hugh.
Laura Ingram on election night started to praise Obama instead of hammering home facts of his socialist agenda. Something we will get a close look at when he starts to abuse the EXECUTIVE ORDERS after he takes office.
Again more fuel for he RINO's. Giving credited to a move to the left. Something that we have got to stop now.
As long as we continue to allow these "moderates" to convince us that we need to bow down to the left we have no chance in maintaining any sort of semblance to fiscal responsibility and sound judgment on foreign issues. We have to send the message now that we will not bend our principles and values to those on the left. A strong backbone is required. RINO's are every where and are doing all they can to undermine the conservative movement.
I am watching/
Friday, November 7, 2008
Just a theory
This is just a theory mind you, but has any one else noted that blogs on the right who advertise are getting adverts that really do not go with their values.
I guess the biggest blog of note that this has happened to is Michelle Malkins. On her advert column one finds an add for Russian Models. these models are what you might say, not clothed to well, or scantily clad. This is essential an outrage but just the beginning.
I refer to Sen. Schummers comment on how the right needs to be treated in the area of broadcasting as pornography, regulated and censored. Could these adds be a subtle way in making an argument for this case in point.
http://michellemalkin.com/
Now one can find Michelles blog on this here:
Fairness Doctrine Watch: Schumer likens conservative opinion to pornography (vid added)
By Michelle Malkin • November 4, 2008 11:01 AM
Also on The Radio Equalizer, you can read about the expected censorship leadership being appointed to the FCC.
Obama Appoints Radical Media Activist To Oversee FCC, Talk Radio Shutdown:
http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-appoints-radical-media-activist.html
Now my theory is simple and can be con screwed by some to be a conspiracy wacko nut job. However we do know that Google who runs the AdSense has many, many left leaning believers in their employee. We also know that Google and Yahoo have sided with certain governments to censor the Internet (CHINA).
So my theory on this is simple. I would conclude that here at first these adds will be written off as a mistake but will increase on the right leaning blogs. A way to add cannon fodder to the censorship of the left after the start of the new year and their attempt to stifle the conservative voice.
We will see an increase in pressure as to a "balanced" dialog on broadcasts for the right. With possible format changes on radio stations as to whether or not they will even keep talk radio.
The MSM media has an inherent left bias as it is and with FOX caving in to pressure form the left the conservative voice is going to find it harder and harder to be heard
A TOOTHLESS FOX?FNC Censors Itself Ahead Of Obama Presidency.
http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/
I am in the shadows watching.
I guess the biggest blog of note that this has happened to is Michelle Malkins. On her advert column one finds an add for Russian Models. these models are what you might say, not clothed to well, or scantily clad. This is essential an outrage but just the beginning.
I refer to Sen. Schummers comment on how the right needs to be treated in the area of broadcasting as pornography, regulated and censored. Could these adds be a subtle way in making an argument for this case in point.
http://michellemalkin.com/
Now one can find Michelles blog on this here:
Fairness Doctrine Watch: Schumer likens conservative opinion to pornography (vid added)
By Michelle Malkin • November 4, 2008 11:01 AM
Also on The Radio Equalizer, you can read about the expected censorship leadership being appointed to the FCC.
Obama Appoints Radical Media Activist To Oversee FCC, Talk Radio Shutdown:
http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2008/11/obama-appoints-radical-media-activist.html
Now my theory is simple and can be con screwed by some to be a conspiracy wacko nut job. However we do know that Google who runs the AdSense has many, many left leaning believers in their employee. We also know that Google and Yahoo have sided with certain governments to censor the Internet (CHINA).
So my theory on this is simple. I would conclude that here at first these adds will be written off as a mistake but will increase on the right leaning blogs. A way to add cannon fodder to the censorship of the left after the start of the new year and their attempt to stifle the conservative voice.
We will see an increase in pressure as to a "balanced" dialog on broadcasts for the right. With possible format changes on radio stations as to whether or not they will even keep talk radio.
The MSM media has an inherent left bias as it is and with FOX caving in to pressure form the left the conservative voice is going to find it harder and harder to be heard
A TOOTHLESS FOX?FNC Censors Itself Ahead Of Obama Presidency.
http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/
I am in the shadows watching.
Thursday, November 6, 2008
ALARM, WARNING, WARNING, RINO ALERT!!!
Did the Republican party not learn anything from this election? They should have learned at least one lesson. This lesson being that we do not want RINO's representing us in Congress.
Well obviously they haven't learned this lesson. This is what they propose. House Republican Deputy Whip Eric Cantor to be nominated to House Whip. This is a bad move.
Voting records may show that Cantor leans conservative, but he has a propensity to do to much isle leaning the other way and is not forceful enough to push the Conservative Republican agenda.
The Prowler, over at The American Spectator writes an interesting article on this.
http://spectator.org/archives/2008/10/27/post-defeat-planners/print
I am in the shadows, watching.
Well obviously they haven't learned this lesson. This is what they propose. House Republican Deputy Whip Eric Cantor to be nominated to House Whip. This is a bad move.
Voting records may show that Cantor leans conservative, but he has a propensity to do to much isle leaning the other way and is not forceful enough to push the Conservative Republican agenda.
The Prowler, over at The American Spectator writes an interesting article on this.
http://spectator.org/archives/2008/10/27/post-defeat-planners/print
I am in the shadows, watching.
Proposed New Administration
Whoa, take a look at the names of the people President elect Obama is looking at for cabinet positions.
Sec. of State - John Kerry. Here is a man who lied about his service record in Viet Nam. Still has not released his medical or military records. Favors European socialism versus American Policies, and is not able to hold a coherent thought.
Bill Richardson, another possible candidate for Sec. of State. What is this mans qualifications? He favors open boarders and a pro Aztlan position on domestic policies. He too favors the Untied nations government over the sovereignty of the Untied States.
Attorney General - Governor Janet Napolitano? Is this for real? Can we expect this woman to enforce the law for the nation when she refuses to enforce Arizona State law when it comes to illegal immigration. This is a woman who needs to be vetted and exposed for the racist and bigot that she is. (note to self)
Sec. of Defense - Colin Powell? This is proof that those on the left are not in control of their faculties. Colin Powell either lied to this country before the war in Iraq started according to the left. Or the left is in fact suffering from B.D.S. in their hypocrisy if nominating this man. Colin Powell either told the truth, in which case we had more proof that Saddam Hussein was a threat, in which case the left are hypocrites for their attacks on this man at the time. Or they prove that the only reason the opposed the war was their jealously of President Bush.
Robert Kennedy Jr.? This man they would like to head up the environment. Lets face facts about this man. He opposes any plan that would make America self dependant on energy. He is not just out there on environmental policies he is in fact a loon and out of touch with reality on these issues. He refuses nuclear power, windmill farms, new hydro electric plants, and coal burning plants. This man can not see the forest for the trees.
What may be a bright spot is the idea of Caroline Kennedy being nominated as Ambassador to the United Nations. Why is this a plus? She is new , fresh to politics, has absolutely no experience what so ever. So she could be a wild card and prove to be good choice. Then again she may be just another political appointee that is a payback for a favor of support for the campaign. Proving that her inexperience is a bad decision. This however should not worry the American public as they decided that inexperience was a plus for a president.
I AM WATCHING.
Sec. of State - John Kerry. Here is a man who lied about his service record in Viet Nam. Still has not released his medical or military records. Favors European socialism versus American Policies, and is not able to hold a coherent thought.
Bill Richardson, another possible candidate for Sec. of State. What is this mans qualifications? He favors open boarders and a pro Aztlan position on domestic policies. He too favors the Untied nations government over the sovereignty of the Untied States.
Attorney General - Governor Janet Napolitano? Is this for real? Can we expect this woman to enforce the law for the nation when she refuses to enforce Arizona State law when it comes to illegal immigration. This is a woman who needs to be vetted and exposed for the racist and bigot that she is. (note to self)
Sec. of Defense - Colin Powell? This is proof that those on the left are not in control of their faculties. Colin Powell either lied to this country before the war in Iraq started according to the left. Or the left is in fact suffering from B.D.S. in their hypocrisy if nominating this man. Colin Powell either told the truth, in which case we had more proof that Saddam Hussein was a threat, in which case the left are hypocrites for their attacks on this man at the time. Or they prove that the only reason the opposed the war was their jealously of President Bush.
Robert Kennedy Jr.? This man they would like to head up the environment. Lets face facts about this man. He opposes any plan that would make America self dependant on energy. He is not just out there on environmental policies he is in fact a loon and out of touch with reality on these issues. He refuses nuclear power, windmill farms, new hydro electric plants, and coal burning plants. This man can not see the forest for the trees.
What may be a bright spot is the idea of Caroline Kennedy being nominated as Ambassador to the United Nations. Why is this a plus? She is new , fresh to politics, has absolutely no experience what so ever. So she could be a wild card and prove to be good choice. Then again she may be just another political appointee that is a payback for a favor of support for the campaign. Proving that her inexperience is a bad decision. This however should not worry the American public as they decided that inexperience was a plus for a president.
I AM WATCHING.
First, retake control of the Republican Party
As we look back at this campaign cycle and note what went wrong, or what did not work. Conservatives and true Republicans need to look at our own party first. See what is broken from with in and lets fix this.
So what is wrong one may ask. Well the Republican party is not the party of Conservatism or even the party of Ronald Regan. It has been subverted and taken over by RINO's. What is a RINO? It is a Republican in name only.
A RINO is someone who has wormed their way into the Republican ticket and used the Obama effect to get into positions of authority. The Obama effect is the new name for the Jimmy Carter effect. A person who comes from out of nowhere. One who the public has no idea of who and what they are. Claiming one thing but in reality being another.
As conservatives we have to clean up our back yard before we look at the neighbors. this means a lot of huge changes need to take place. The best time to do this is for the base to come out and support true conservatives and not incumbent RINO's in office come the 2010 election.
Conservatives every where in this country if we have to need to run for office and replace these subversives to conservative ideas, as independents if need be. Once the RINO's are replaced only then can we move forward and retake the White House from the left.
All RINO's should be categorised as any MODERATE and left leaning Republican in office. Those who side with the left on all major issues. Holding true tom our beliefs and not compromising should not be considered as being obstinate, but embraced as having backbone.
The largest grassroots movement in history needs to start right now by getting organised at the local level and removing again the so called moderates from the party and local offices in the party now. Writing and demanding that State officials and then National officials remember that they are only in Washington or at State Capitols by our whim and not there to sit on their laurels and collect a check. We are their EMPLOYERS and we will exercise our rights to remove them/fire them when they do not perform.
The newly elected Republicans need a rude wake up call. I am going to be on Cheri Gerou like stink on you know what. She is my newly elected State Representative. I am going to hold her accountable to conservative ideals and not moderate ways. Why? I am the Avenger this is why. Do not forget that I lurk in the shadows. I am that tingle in the hairs on liberals necks. I am that one who asks the questions and DEMANDS the answer.
I am the NEMESIS of the left, and those who do not represent their constituents.
So what is wrong one may ask. Well the Republican party is not the party of Conservatism or even the party of Ronald Regan. It has been subverted and taken over by RINO's. What is a RINO? It is a Republican in name only.
A RINO is someone who has wormed their way into the Republican ticket and used the Obama effect to get into positions of authority. The Obama effect is the new name for the Jimmy Carter effect. A person who comes from out of nowhere. One who the public has no idea of who and what they are. Claiming one thing but in reality being another.
As conservatives we have to clean up our back yard before we look at the neighbors. this means a lot of huge changes need to take place. The best time to do this is for the base to come out and support true conservatives and not incumbent RINO's in office come the 2010 election.
Conservatives every where in this country if we have to need to run for office and replace these subversives to conservative ideas, as independents if need be. Once the RINO's are replaced only then can we move forward and retake the White House from the left.
All RINO's should be categorised as any MODERATE and left leaning Republican in office. Those who side with the left on all major issues. Holding true tom our beliefs and not compromising should not be considered as being obstinate, but embraced as having backbone.
The largest grassroots movement in history needs to start right now by getting organised at the local level and removing again the so called moderates from the party and local offices in the party now. Writing and demanding that State officials and then National officials remember that they are only in Washington or at State Capitols by our whim and not there to sit on their laurels and collect a check. We are their EMPLOYERS and we will exercise our rights to remove them/fire them when they do not perform.
The newly elected Republicans need a rude wake up call. I am going to be on Cheri Gerou like stink on you know what. She is my newly elected State Representative. I am going to hold her accountable to conservative ideals and not moderate ways. Why? I am the Avenger this is why. Do not forget that I lurk in the shadows. I am that tingle in the hairs on liberals necks. I am that one who asks the questions and DEMANDS the answer.
I am the NEMESIS of the left, and those who do not represent their constituents.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
How to define the left
How do we define the left in this country. In question how do we define the left in general? During the 2008 Presidential campaign we heard the word socialist thrown around a lot. But what is a socialist?
Socialism is defined as follows:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism
1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
So a socialist would be someone who supports this general way of thinking. How does this relate to President elect Obama? How does it relate to any of the elected democrats and RINO's in office today? Both very good questions and we shall try to show the connections of our government and the belief they have in a socialist system. Which would make them either socialist or socialist sympathisers.
Look at the policies that President elect Obama has talked about and plans to implement. Look closely at those who he is choosing to be in his cabinet. Then look at their records and what they support. It does not take a collage degree to see where they would suit on the political spectrum. A poly sci student in day one of class can figure this one out. Even in today's leftist filled propagandised classrooms.
I AM WATCHING.
Socialism is defined as follows:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism
1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
So a socialist would be someone who supports this general way of thinking. How does this relate to President elect Obama? How does it relate to any of the elected democrats and RINO's in office today? Both very good questions and we shall try to show the connections of our government and the belief they have in a socialist system. Which would make them either socialist or socialist sympathisers.
Look at the policies that President elect Obama has talked about and plans to implement. Look closely at those who he is choosing to be in his cabinet. Then look at their records and what they support. It does not take a collage degree to see where they would suit on the political spectrum. A poly sci student in day one of class can figure this one out. Even in today's leftist filled propagandised classrooms.
I AM WATCHING.
Colorado and Immigration. The law!
Is your Colorado town following the state law and reporting ILLEGALS? the chances are that they are not.
If they are not it is your job to remind them it is the law and to enforce it.
Here is the law:
Arrestee Immigration StatusSenate Bill 06-90Reports to Federal Government
In accordance with Article 29 of Title 29, Colorado Revised Statutes, all Colorado local governments, including every town, city, city and county, and county are required to cooperate with federal officials in matters concerning the enforcement of state and federal laws regarding immigration as follows:
1) Any peace officer who has probable cause to believe that an arrestee for a criminal offense, except domestic violence, is not legally present in the United States must report the incident to the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office (ICE) whenever the arrestee is NOT detained.
2) If the arrestee IS detained and the county sheriff reasonably believes that the arrestee is not legally present in the United States, then the sheriff must report the arrestee to the ICE (except arrestees for domestic violence).
3) A person who is arrested for a domestic violence offence and who is believed to be in the country illegally must be reported to ICE when he or she is convicted.
Each governing body must report to the Legislative Council of the General Assembly annually, on or before March 1 of each year, the number of reports made to ICE.
If they are not it is your job to remind them it is the law and to enforce it.
Here is the law:
Arrestee Immigration StatusSenate Bill 06-90Reports to Federal Government
In accordance with Article 29 of Title 29, Colorado Revised Statutes, all Colorado local governments, including every town, city, city and county, and county are required to cooperate with federal officials in matters concerning the enforcement of state and federal laws regarding immigration as follows:
1) Any peace officer who has probable cause to believe that an arrestee for a criminal offense, except domestic violence, is not legally present in the United States must report the incident to the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Office (ICE) whenever the arrestee is NOT detained.
2) If the arrestee IS detained and the county sheriff reasonably believes that the arrestee is not legally present in the United States, then the sheriff must report the arrestee to the ICE (except arrestees for domestic violence).
3) A person who is arrested for a domestic violence offence and who is believed to be in the country illegally must be reported to ICE when he or she is convicted.
Each governing body must report to the Legislative Council of the General Assembly annually, on or before March 1 of each year, the number of reports made to ICE.
Time to hammer home accountability
Nancy Pelosi recently said that if you vote the democrats in you will be able to hold them accountable for their actions and vote. Well along with Nancy we have a return of the corruption to Washington. Jack (ab scam, insult the base) Murtha, William “Cold Cash” Jefferson, Harry "land deals" Reid, Barney "I can't manage my check book but let me manage yours" Frank.
There is also Chuck "time to censor the right" Schumer, Charles "tax avoid er" Rangel. Yes sir this what the American left has brainwashed the youth to help keep in office.
Colorado is no better in the picture as it has moved from a center left position under Gov.Ritter and State Senate Pres Romonoff. It has voted in Mark "I am incompetent?" Udall, do not confuse with anything resembling a moderate with this man, to the U.S. Senate. While making the state legislature more of a quagmire in liberalism.
Diana DeGette, Jared Polis, John Salazar, Betsy Markey, Ed Perlmutter, all democrats and liberal elitists are voted into office on a national level.
Jeanne Labuda, Mark Ferrandino, Anne McGihon, Jerry Frangas, Joel Judd, Lois Court, Terrence Carroll, Joe Miklosi, Jack Pommer, Paul Weissmann, Claire Levy, Dennis Apuan, Michael Merrifield, Gwyn Green, Sue Schafer, Andy Kerr, Sara Gagliardi, Jim Kerr, Debbie Benefield, Judy Solano, Dianne Primavera, John Soper, Cherylin Peniston, Su Ryden, Joe Rice, Karen Middleton, Buffie McFadyen, Jim Riesberg, John Kefalas, Randy Fischer, Bernie Buescher, Christine Scanlan, Rafael Gallegos, Wes McKinley, all more democrats. At least 34 out of 65 district seats are held by democrats in the state House. More then enough for Gov. Ritter to push his tax and spend agenda on to Colorado. Mimicking that of the National House in Washington D.C.
Even though the amendments and referendums on this years ballot calling for an increase of taxes were defeated. This liberal makeup will still find ways around TABOR to increase spending and hike taxes on Colorado tax payers.
Yes it is time to hold these people accountable for every dime they spend. I am watching and will be spreading the word on their liberal agenda of social quotas in the name of equality.
Be for warned. You are all being watched. I am in the shadows taking notes.
There is also Chuck "time to censor the right" Schumer, Charles "tax avoid er" Rangel. Yes sir this what the American left has brainwashed the youth to help keep in office.
Colorado is no better in the picture as it has moved from a center left position under Gov.Ritter and State Senate Pres Romonoff. It has voted in Mark "I am incompetent?" Udall, do not confuse with anything resembling a moderate with this man, to the U.S. Senate. While making the state legislature more of a quagmire in liberalism.
Diana DeGette, Jared Polis, John Salazar, Betsy Markey, Ed Perlmutter, all democrats and liberal elitists are voted into office on a national level.
Jeanne Labuda, Mark Ferrandino, Anne McGihon, Jerry Frangas, Joel Judd, Lois Court, Terrence Carroll, Joe Miklosi, Jack Pommer, Paul Weissmann, Claire Levy, Dennis Apuan, Michael Merrifield, Gwyn Green, Sue Schafer, Andy Kerr, Sara Gagliardi, Jim Kerr, Debbie Benefield, Judy Solano, Dianne Primavera, John Soper, Cherylin Peniston, Su Ryden, Joe Rice, Karen Middleton, Buffie McFadyen, Jim Riesberg, John Kefalas, Randy Fischer, Bernie Buescher, Christine Scanlan, Rafael Gallegos, Wes McKinley, all more democrats. At least 34 out of 65 district seats are held by democrats in the state House. More then enough for Gov. Ritter to push his tax and spend agenda on to Colorado. Mimicking that of the National House in Washington D.C.
Even though the amendments and referendums on this years ballot calling for an increase of taxes were defeated. This liberal makeup will still find ways around TABOR to increase spending and hike taxes on Colorado tax payers.
Yes it is time to hold these people accountable for every dime they spend. I am watching and will be spreading the word on their liberal agenda of social quotas in the name of equality.
Be for warned. You are all being watched. I am in the shadows taking notes.
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Let the games begin
The election is over and the left are having a great time. Celebrating their questionable victory over the American way of life. A darkness falls upon those who are conservative. Dread and fear of possible false persecutions. Slanderous accusations of racism and bigotry.
The games in Washington are being set into motion and readied to play. Higher taxes, social and civil injustices to be played out in the name of political correctness.
Have no fear conservatives. Our day is not over yet. though this country is more then likely to be set back thirty to forty years. A loss of international creditability and respect can be won back when we retake control of this nation in 2010.
Let the left be happy for now. Let them celebrate. It will be short lived when the masses see the left for the tyrants they truly are.
Sarah Palin and Bobby Jindel are waiting in the wings. Strategies for their 2012 run are under way as you read this. The word will get out and those who seek to ruin this country shall be forced out of office by the same masses that were brainwashed into voting them in.
Many governorships, senate seats and house seats are up for grabs come 2010. We shall prevail. We shall return America back to its strength and its position of leadership in the world.
Just like the serial shows of the golden age of radio. The good guys shall win in the end. So stay tuned. Stay informed. Stay safe my com padres. The avenger is loose.
The games in Washington are being set into motion and readied to play. Higher taxes, social and civil injustices to be played out in the name of political correctness.
Have no fear conservatives. Our day is not over yet. though this country is more then likely to be set back thirty to forty years. A loss of international creditability and respect can be won back when we retake control of this nation in 2010.
Let the left be happy for now. Let them celebrate. It will be short lived when the masses see the left for the tyrants they truly are.
Sarah Palin and Bobby Jindel are waiting in the wings. Strategies for their 2012 run are under way as you read this. The word will get out and those who seek to ruin this country shall be forced out of office by the same masses that were brainwashed into voting them in.
Many governorships, senate seats and house seats are up for grabs come 2010. We shall prevail. We shall return America back to its strength and its position of leadership in the world.
Just like the serial shows of the golden age of radio. The good guys shall win in the end. So stay tuned. Stay informed. Stay safe my com padres. The avenger is loose.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
